A Womanist’s Perspective by Sara Wright

Last night I was listening to plant scientist Monica Gagliano who is pushing the boundaries of what we know about plants. She proved that plants respond to the sound of water by moving toward it and cannot be tricked. Bio-acoustics is the study of sound and Monica is researching other ways that plants communicate. We know they use chemical messengers to warn each other above ground and below through the mycelial network thanks to the work of Suzanne Simard who I shall discuss in a moment. We have learned that plants emit electrical impulses. But Monica is studying another way that plants communicate. She says they listen to all the plants around them and learn from each other so that they do not have to re-invent the wheel with each generation. In one amazing memory experiment mimosa plants taught her that plants remember what happened to them previously and don’t repeat their mistakes. The Mind of Plants was her first book. She also studied with Indigenous healers in the Amazon and discusses this mysterious and compelling journey in her latest book Thus Spoke the Plants.

Suzanne Simard discovered that trees communicate above and below ground through complex mycelial networks, favoring their kin, transferring nutrients, water, and carbon back and forth between broadleaf trees that photosynethize most efficiently during the summer months and share their food with conifers in the fall, when the two types of trees reverse the process and the conifers feed the deciduous trees. Needled conifers photosynthesize for much longer periods (though less efficiently) Trees in a forest live in community and the emphasis is on the health of the whole forest and not the individual tree or plant (competition does exist to some degree but overall, the forest works as a sentient living being with an eye on the health of the whole. The moment a tree falls it begins to nourish other trees and plants on the forest floor. Walk through any forest that hasn’t been logged for awhile and you will be amazed at the ground covers, seedlings, mosses, lichens that spring from one old stump. One fallen log can become a nursery for a whole row of seedlings.

After writing a memoir that every woman should read “Finding the Mother Tree” Suzanne founded the 100-year Mother Tree project that focuses on long term tree research incorporating her graduate student as assistants (some of whom are now scientists as well). In Suzanne’s words, “The Mother Tree project is investigating forest renewal practices that will protect biodiversity, carbon storage and forest regeneration as climate changes.  This field-based research compares various retention levels of Mother Trees (large, old trees) and their neighbors, as well as regenerating seedling mixtures, in Douglas-fir forests located across nine climatic regions in British Columbia”.

 Suzanne who began her life a logger and comes from a family of loggers has also been working with Indigenous peoples, most of whom are professionals. She discovered that what she learned about trees as a child ‘being part of the forest herself’ is the same way Indigenous peoples learned about nature through their keen senses of observation, intuition and feeling; they listened, they dreamed, and the forest spoke.

Robin Wall Kimmerer another plant scientist is best known for her book Braiding Sweetgrass: Indigenous Wisdom, Scientific Knowledge, and the Teachings of Plants. Her first book and my favorite because I love mosseshappens to be Gathering Moss. She is also a distinguished Professor of Environmental and Forest Biology and Director for the Center for Native Peoples and the Environment at the State University of New York. Kimmerer has Indigenous roots – she is a member of the Potawatomi Nation and successfully blends science with Indigenous wisdom demonstrating primarily through story, personal narrative as well as science an alternative to the life destroying paradigm we are presently living through.

One commonality between all three is that they have merged imagination, keen observation, intuition, feeling, and the use of all bodily senses with rigorous scientific experimentation upsetting the dominant materialistic paradigm that is stuck on objectivity. Since there is no such thing as objectivity because of the well documented observer effect which states that the observer will effect whatever is being observedjust one more indication that we are all interconnected) we must ask why materialistic science is so resistant to these new plant studies that indicate sentience in plants. What would we have to change if for example we acknowledged that plants have feelings? What could we learn from 400 million year old trees?

The second common thread is that all three of these scientists currently work with Indigenous Peoples crediting them with Ancient Knowledge that western science is only recently uncovering using the scientific method. Ask an Indigenous person how they learned about plants, and you will be told the plants taught them.

What does this blending of disparate traditions tell us? The obvious answer is that we can learn from both the Original Peoples of this land as well as from open minded rigorous science. And yet, this has not happened. Instead, these women scientists have been dismissed for the most part. Is this because they refuse to separate their science from their senses?

Because I am a Naturalist I have been asking the same sorts of questions as these female scientists have about plants – how do they know what they know – (and receiving answers, not through words, but through my bodily senses) I am still thrilled that these cutting – edge women scientists are proving what the plants have been teaching me all my life. Like Suzanne Simard and Robin Wall Kimmerer and Gagliano the naturalist’s keen eye can uncover hidden worlds. And like Kimmerer I too have Indigenous roots.

What is very interesting/ disturbing to me is that none of these women all of whom are ground-breaking scientists identifies herself as a feminist, although their stories are remarkable, and all share intimate portraits of their lives along with whatever scientific expertise/ discoveries belong to them. The word feminist is apparently pejorative when it comes to being a female scientist.

If I am absolutely honest, although I openly acknowledge that I am an eco -feminist I also make a point of explaining exactly what I mean by the words I use. I never used to feel the need to do this; sometimes I even feel uncomfortable using the word feminist around others. I do believe that what happens to nature happens to women and many men to a lesser degree, and that there is a toxic power structure in place that supports white supremacy, racism, classism etc. I could go on here. Patriarchy is a killer.

If I am willing to query the change in myself, I wonder how other women feel, and if this is a destructive pattern that is developing around our identity as feminists. We have always been marginalized. Are we once again becoming afraid to speak our truths? We may still protest, but overall, the entire cultural structure around feminism seems to be shifting into a downward trend.

I would surely like to know what others think.

 Postscript: ‘Womanist’ was Alice Walker’s different version of feminism from African-American women’s experience. Always loved the concept.

BIO: Sara Wright is a naturalist, ethologist (a person who studies animals in their natural habitats) (former) Jungian Pattern Analyst, and a writer. She publishes her work regularly in a number of different venues and is presently living in Maine.



Categories: Eco-systems, Ecofeminism, Environmental Spirituality, General, Nature

Tags: , , , , , , ,

4 replies

  1. You ask so many great questions, each of which could be a post in itself! Just a couple of thoughts… that’s a really interesting question about whether the women scientists are being dismissed because they are women or because they are blending science and their intuition and senses. If there are ever male scientists who do the same blending, it would be interesting to see if they are also dismissed. This all reminds me of the continuing controversies in archeology over ancient matriarchal cultures. For decades the work of Marija Gimbutas was denigrated, and now, many years after her passing, other archeologists and scholars are validating her work.

    While the women scientists you mention may not identify as feminists, I think it’s important to note that they are living lives made possible by feminism. They are living as feminists by being women scientists, something that was very rare when I was growing up but is now fairly common. I see this in generations younger than me — they have just accepted that they can be whatever they choose and are doing it without calling themselves feminists. ‘

    I don’t know what it all means – just a couple of thoughts!

    Liked by 1 person

    • I like this Carolyn – these women may simply be living their lives no longer requiring naming… and yet I sense it still may have to do with identifying as a feminist – women are still dismissed in science more than men unless the scientist is someone like Rupert Sheldrake a personal friend who rocked the science world 40 years ago with “A New Science of Life” and was kicked out of academia because he posited that all nature was alive and had consciousness… if you read or listen to the work these women have done they are blending senses with groundbreaking science and owning it much to the old regime’s displeasure….. and then there is my own feelings – it’s a complex issue which is why I hoped for more conversation. Thanks for weighing in!

      Like

  2. I have proudly identified as a feminist for over 60 years now. I spent my younger years working to promote women’s equality and to eradicate violence against women. I consider sexism to be the original ‘ism”, as female and male are numerically balanced.
    At this point in my life, I believe patriarchy’s hatred is of anything feminine, especially the qualities of cooperation, oneness, equality, peace and intuition. Whether these qualities and attendant behaviours appear in men or women, they are attacked and devalued in western cultures. Suzanne Simard’s early experiences of speaking her truth to the old guard of loggers and scientists is familiar to most of us. Her determination to continue to study with an open mind, and share her findings with the world is much appreciated and admired.
    Thanks for the opportunity to share in this discussion. I do miss it!

    Like

    • I’m missing discussion more and more – this used to be such a vibrant space. We have such dedicated women working so hard behind the scenes – Thank you so much for sharing your experience. Patriarhy’s hatred has if anything intensified and I am uncertain of outcome…

      Like

Please familiarize yourself with our Comment Policy before posting.

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

%d bloggers like this: