Wrestling with Jewish Learning By Casey Tova Markenson

TOVA_01You will be handed a sheet of paper. The paper will have a quote from the Torah or the Gemara or Abraham Joshua Heschel. The ‘what’ and ‘who’ and ‘why’ behind those sources will not be explained. You will read the passage and reflect on it with a partner. In ten minutes, you will share a piece of your conversation with the rest of the group. Then, the Jewish part of the Jewish social justice program you’re about to experience will be complete.

I have read and reflected on countless texts as part of that ritual. I don’t remember any of them. I do remember being embarrassed that I didn’t know who Rebbe Nachman was. I remember sensing that my training in literary criticism didn’t “count” as Jewish knowledge. I do remember every time I revealed that I misunderstood a detail or a Hebrew word, and all of the times that a (usually male identified) peer excessively explained it.  I remember feeling left out of an exclusive club, one that I was embarrassed to want to join to begin with.

In addition to the content of Jewish learning feeling alienating, I’ve often struggled with the pedagogy.  For example, at the start of my year as a Corps Member with AVODAH: The Jewish Service Corps, the facilitator introduced Kashrut, traditional Jewish dietary laws, by asking the group to divide up in terms of “teachers” – those who had more familiarity with Kashrut – and “learners” – those who were less familiar. The “teachers” then taught the rules to the “learners.” By outing myself as a person who knew “less,” I was cast in the role of a person who can’t engage in or lead Jewish conversations. As rules and histories were explained to me, I was to listen, to be silent. I quickly grew tired of sitting through lengthy, impromptu lectures, so I stopped asking questions.

~~~~~

Do programs where Jews inhabit the same spaces inherently make those spaces Jewish? That question has been on my mind in my role as the Communications, Outreach, and Marketing Strategist at Ma’yan, a Jewish feminist non-profit. At Ma’yan, we’re currently preparing for our next Research Training Internship (RTI), a 15-month research, activism and leadership boot camp for young Jewish women. Based on the model of Participatory Action Research, the RTI culminates in a youth led research project that explores the interns’ experiences and those of their communities. For the last RTI cohort, that meant creating a video about sexism in the media; in it, the RTIs analyze the texts and images that surround us, and critically examine the impact they have on our bodies and self-perceptions. As former RTI Helia Precel reflects, being constantly surrounded by photo-shopped images causes girls to dislike themselves, making them think “I don’t look like this person who I see all around me, so something must be wrong with me.” What, then, is the secret of the perfect, Jewish girl?

It’s a loaded question, especially due to the RTI’s pluralistic setting. The young Jewish women that we work with are predominantly white and have class privilege – while they’re likely to connect over the pressures of being female bodied and from their particular background, the spectrum of what it means to perform Jewishness can fracture that shared identity. Although the young women that we support all struggle with imposed expectations around Judaism, a modern orthodox girl who attends Jewish day school is facing different expectations from a girl in secular reform communities; they’re bringing distinct, if not disparate, relationships to Judaism to the conversation. How can that range of perspectives deepen the cohort’s connection, rather than splinter it?

While Ma’yan disrupts expectations around Jewish learning, it also renders that learning invisible. Digressing from the expected ritual of reading texts written by dead, straight, white, cis-gendered Jewish men de-legitimizes the Jewishness of the RTI. So what’s a Jewish social justice educator to do? When faced with the options of repeating activities that are authoritatively, indisputably “Jewish” versus wrestling with why Jewish programming is ubiquitously vapid, the default isn’t surprising. Or is it?

Writing the word “wrestle” triggered a memory: At the same AVODAH: The Jewish Service Corps orientation where I was fated to be a person to whom Judaism needed to be explained, I remember reading the passage where Jacob wrestles with an angel. (And so I must rescind my earlier claim that my memory is void of any text that I’ve read in a Jewish setting. It may stand out because it closes with Jacob’s renaming, a change that I was on the brink of experiencing.) My reading of that story hinges on the act of wrestling – that challenging, rigorous engagement with one another, with our tradition, and with our narratives is key to what it means to be Jewish. In that case, we need to wrestle with the notion that Judaism belongs to people who hold a particular kind of knowledge. We need to argue for Jewish experiences that approach identity holistically. We need to push against the hierarchy between the learners and the learned.

Casey Tova Markenson is a feminist writer, scholar, and theatre maker. She currently works as the Communications, Marketing, and Outreach Strategist at Ma’yan, a Jewish feminist nonprofit in New York City. She holds a Bachelors in English from Carleton College and is starting an Interdisciplinary PhD in Theatre and Drama at Northwestern in the fall. Casey Tova is an alumna of AVODAH: The Jewish Service Corps and ADAMAH: The Jewish Environmental Fellowship. Her work has been published in Skyd Magazine, Jewesses With Attitude, and Tenth Muse.


Discover more from Feminism and Religion

Subscribe to get the latest posts sent to your email.

6 thoughts on “Wrestling with Jewish Learning By Casey Tova Markenson”

  1. In my experience, “Jewishly trained” by which is meant Talmudically trained is often a criterion for jobs teaching Judaism and Jewish Studies, thus putting “other” Jews at a disadvantage in hiring, and therefore also in the teaching of Judaism. Thanks for questioning this assumption.

    Like

  2. When I work in the arts, freedom of ideas and freedom of the form of their expression is a given. When I connect with religion, it tends to fufull the literal meaning of that term, that is, “to bind fast.” Your holistic approach would appear to unbind the wrestler somewhat, and it suggests a path of approaching your faith more creatively in other aspects as well.

    Like

  3. Very interesting. It would be interesting to hear how your training in theater compares with your training in Jewishness.

    Like

  4. Very good questions. I deal with them mostly by avoiding classes/discussions with people who believe there is only one way to do Judaism.
    At the Aleph Kallah in 2009 I co-taught a session entitled “Fitting your Life into Judaism &/or fitting Judaism into your life” The description was “Following R`Zalman’s /psychohalakha/ we ask how to build a more Jewish version of our present life—not fitting our lives to Judaism but fitting Judaism into our lives– exploring how each of us individually sees Judaism, where we would like to go with it, and how we have been going about it.” We discussed such topics as “How can I make my daily activities more “Jewish”? Is it proper to build a /personal/ Jewish practice? How can I appropriate practices from other traditions into my Judaism?” While we were prepared with texts, our pedagogical technique was “Our experiences & understanding can all be tools for each other.”
    At the end, we went around the circle asking “What one new thing will you add to your Jewish practice?” I was thrilled when one woman answered “I work long hours and come home tired. On Friday nights, I will now treat myself to a long bath rather than immediately rushing into weekend activities”.

    Like

  5. Lovely post, Casey. I’m glad you mentioned the notion of “mansplaining” in religious discourse (though you didn’t use that term specifically). That has happened to me frequently in the Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-day Saints. I’m no longer a member of that group, but when I was, I found that I’d often have males in their twenties (my age) feeling like they needed to preemptively connect the dots for me on scriptural matters, before even bothering to find out that I was kind of a scripture nut and frequent participator in temple ritual and churchgoing. It was cute how often I had the Mormon temple rituals explained to me right out of the gate, even though I’ve been to them more often than many of the men had and was able to pose questions and thoughts that they had never considered before. I am not a religion expert by any means, but I always found it more than a little uncomfortable that most of the men around me assumed I was completely ignorant of the covenants I’d made and the scriptures I followed until I stopped them and demonstrated that I am not completely ignorant. In our group, the divide between “learned” and “learner” was often assumed to be a party line between men and women, or people who’d returned from compulsory two-year missions (men) and those who have the option to serve or not serve a mission (women). The LDS Church praises the intellectual equality of men and women, but in practice it still seems a little imbalanced to many female members.

    Like

    1. Interesting. I’ve had similar experiences with born-again Christians who assume that I know nothing about the Bible. I was raised as a Lutheran, and I can usually run rings around those born-agains, with my knowledge of the Bible, despite the fact that I am now an atheist! There’s a lot of ignorance in this world – much of it in the minds of people who aren’t aware of their own ignorance!

      Like

Please familiarize yourself with our Comment Policy before posting.

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.