FAR: The Bodies of Christ, Broken for You by Tallessyn Zawn Grenfell-Lee


Years ago, I learned of a small Christian sect that has an unusual sexual practice due to an interpretation of each Christian as the literal ‘bride of Christ.’ Every member of this religion is instructed from the age of 12 to imagine their sexuality always in relation to the (male) person of Jesus; men are encouraged to imagine they are women during intercourse and masturbation, to avoid a homoerotic relationship with Jesus; and they basically imagine their wives are Jesus.

I admit that I find this idea both bizarre and alarming. Yet, ironically, this sexual practice does accomplish one interesting goal: men imagine women as the literal Body of Christ.

Huh.

Now, to be clear, I am highly wary of literalism in any religion or ideology; I could write this entire piece on the problems with this group’s theology and praxis. But as I was mulling this idea over, it did remind me that the original intent of the idea of the Body of Christ often gets neglected, ignored, or outright denied. We do not recognize the body of Christ in ourselves or those around us. We deny Christ. How… fitting.

Often, Christians and others assume that the concept of “Christ” refers to the historical, human person of Jesus of Nazareth. But “Christ” is just the Greek translation of the Hebrew “Messiah,” or “anointed one.” The (Jewish) authors of the New Testament connected the symbol of Christ with ancient Hebrew ideas of eternal, divine wisdom; and they sought to name Jesus as one of the wise (female and male) Jewish leaders, chosen by the Divine to bring liberation and justpeace into the world. The Jewish community of that period would have understood these connections – just as they would have understood all the warnings against idolatry. Jesus never asks to be worshiped; and the term used in the New Testament for how people respond when they recognize the sacred wisdom of his teachings, often translated as ‘worship,’ refers to the same acts of reverence also shown to Jewish high priests at the time.

In the meantime, sometimes Christians focus so hard on the Messenger that they forget about the Message. Isn’t it mighty convenient that this shift away from social justice and toward personal piety creates lots of room for big money interests to manipulate well meaning people for their own further self-enrichment? And interestingly, one of the most effective ways to counter this strategy turns out to be… well, to go to church. Of all things.

Lo and behold, it turns out that those who consistently attend regular religious worship are generally more tolerant of people from other ethnic, political, and religious backgrounds. Even though church attendance can definitely reinforce people’s political stances (both conservative and progressive), it still fosters the ability to see humanity across lines of diversity; although until recently, the queer community has only experienced this trend in liberal churches. Conversely, the secularism that many hoped would end culture wars has had the opposite effect, driving both conservatives and liberals into homogeneous echo chambers where they develop increasingly less tolerant stances.

Some suggest that church communities offer opportunities to interact with people from other ethnic and socioeconomic groups, a form of the Contact Hypothesis that breaks down stereotypes and divisions. But even in churches without much diversity, regular attendance still leads to more tolerance. Instead of being the cause of recent spikes in hate crimes, could churches actually be counteracting them? Could the religions themselves have something of value to offer?

Ancient religions arose within communities seeking the sacred, seeking liberation, and justice. While extremists will always use religion to promote extremism, religions as a whole preach tolerance, humility, and even celebration of diversity. Although far from perfect – humans are, after all, imperfect – something about regularly practicing our religions, in community, apparently helps us remember and reclaim the divinity within ourselves, one another, and all Creation. Which brings me back to the Body of Christ.

As black liberation theologian James Cone points out:

Despite the obvious similarities between Jesus’ death on a cross and the death of thousands of black men and women strung up to die on a lamppost or tree, relatively few people… have explored the symbolic connections. Yet, I believe this is a challenge we must face. What is at stake is the credibility and promise of the Christian gospel and the hope that we may heal the wounds of racial violence that continue to divide our churches and our society.

The redemption and healing Cone describes extends to everywhere in Creation where human sinfulness causes suffering. As Paul writes,

Those parts of the body that seem to be lesser are indispensable, and the parts that we think are less honorable we clothe with greater honor… If one part suffers, every part suffers with it; if one part is honored, every part rejoices with it.

Now you are the body of Christ; each one of you is a part of it.

[1 Cor 12:22-7]

Christians must always claim the original intent of the Body of Christ, broken because of sin. Until we see the broken body of Christ in the suffering children intentionally separated from their parents at our southern border, until we recognize the most holy and precious Divine in their beautiful little bodies, in their parents, in ourselves, we will not be able to find the liberation, the salvation, that our country desperately needs. How many bodies are broken to bring us cheap food? Cheap clothes? Cheap oil? How many bodies of Christ are broken for us?

Every corner of Creation cries out in anguish. Our own bodies cry out. When we deny the sacred, in ourselves and those around us, we deny Christ. Can we claim the Body of Christ in ourselves? In our children – all of them? In our lands? How have we contributed to the wounds? Do we repent? How do we honor the Christ, eternal Source of holy Wisdom? It is – we are – at once broken and whole, anguished and resurrected, dying and reborn with mighty strength and power.

I danced in the morning when the world was begun,
And I danced in the moon and the stars and the sun,
I’ve danced through the prophets all across the Earth,
In Life and Love I have my birth.

I danced before power and rigidity,
But they would not dance and they would not follow me;
I danced for the lowly and the brave and scorned;
They came to me and the dance went on.

I danced in the holy place and sang my Name;
The holy people said it was a shame;
They whipped and they stripped and they hung me high;
And they left me there on a cross to die.

I danced on a Friday and the sky turned black;
It’s hard to dance with the devil on your back;
They buried a body and they thought I’d gone,
But I am the dance and I still go on.

I stepped through death and I leapt up high,
I am the Life that will never, never die;
I’ll live in you as you’ll live in me;
I am the Life and the Dance and Free.

Dance, then, wherever you may be;
I am the Life and the Dance and Free,
And I’ll lead you all wherever you may be,
And I’ll lead you all in the dance with me.

 

Tallessyn Zawn Grenfell-Lee recently earned her Ph.D. in social and ecological ethics from Boston University School of Theology. She continues to study intersections of ecofeminism, permaculture ethics, grief, and nature connection. She previously did graduate research on Alzheimer’s Disease and preventive research on Ovarian Cancer. She received a B.Sc. in biology from the Massachusetts Institute of Technology, an M.A. in Molecular Biology from Harvard University, and an M.Div. from the Boston University School of Theology. She lives in central Massachusetts with her husband and two daughters, and enjoys gardening, canoeing, learning about medicinal and edible wild plants, and rewriting old hymns to make them more inclusive.

Advertisements


Categories: Body, Christianity, Jesus, Sexuality

Tags: , ,

7 replies

  1. Thank you,Tallessyn. This touches on my struggle with the language, literalism, and reality of how we perceive the “Body of Christ”. I cringe when I hear: “When you feed the hungry and shelter the homeless…etc, you feed and shelter Jesus” I know what it means, but it feels like “Mike” and “Josephine” have become invisible. It feels like another way of negating people who get passed by on the streets of probably all our cities. I didn’t feel this way when you referred to the children on the US southern border. Maybe it has to do with numbers, with groups so large “she” and “he” become “they”. Maybe it has to do with my past as a financial assistance worker, knowing the names and circumstances and abuse so many people experience.

    Yet, I perceive in all of creation, the presence of the Divine Mystery, a Holy Spirit, or whatever inadequate name we use. We who claim to be followers of Jesus of Nazareth use “Body of Christ”.

    I think we need to reflect more and develop a language that avoids erasing the person, but recognizes the Divine Presence in all of Creation. But then some of us are just realizing that the Earth is more than a resource for our greed. Or maybe I just need to relax more and go with “I know what they mean”. At any rate, I appreciate your insights here.

    Like

    • Thank you for these thoughts, Barbara. I agree that language can become associated with certain modes of thought; sometimes, using a new turn of phrase can help illustrate ancient meaning more effectively. It is so important to continue to try to understand what yields the fruits of the spirit versus what does not!

      Like

  2. Thank you, this is amazing. I’m so glad you got to meet Cone a few times.

    Like

    • Thank you, Trelawney. It was a true blessing to hear him speak and to have the opportunity to speak with him myself, and share thoughts on ecofeminism. He is unforgettable.

      Like

  3. Thank you for sharing your perspective, Tallessyn. I’m glad to know that some church-goers see more tolerance – you said “it still fosters the ability to see humanity across lines of diversity” – that hasn’t, unfortunately, been my witnessed experience here in my area in southwest Missouri. In fact, one of the pastors of a megachurch nearby (who posts videos of his sermons and it raised quite a stink a while back) blasted other belief systems are demonic. Nevertheless, I applaud those of you who are sincerely trying to shift Christianity in a more tolerant direction.

    Like

    • Darla, I am so sorry that this pastor was violently intolerant. As I say above, extremist leaders always promote extremism, which is a form of violence. Although my experiences with Christianity in the northeast have almost without exception been of people seeking to be more and more tolerant, I know there is much intolerance- in every religion/ideology, particularly when coopted by power. I was heartened to learn that the general trend of the simple spiritual discipline of attendance in religious services actually goes toward tolerance – it was news to me. For the purposes of the study I read, the people who identify with Christianity but do not practice it are left to interpret for themselves what it means and does not mean, with no accountability to anyone but their own ego; I can easily see how that would lead to intolerance, particularly in today’s manipulative political climate (apparently, it leads to both religious and secular intolerance). It also makes me wonder whether the wisdom within religious traditions is able to transcend its leaders and reach people (heavens, I sure hope so), or whether there is on the balance more [trying to be] moderate and tolerant leadership than extremist and intolerant leadership (I hope so on that, too), or some combination of those and other factors, including the fact that most people want to believe they are tolerant and loving people, and maybe service attendance helps reinforce that part of people’s core identities.

      Either way, my experience with all the religions that I have participated in has been one in which I do not agree with everything the leaders say, and I think most people are also like that. I have been in many settings of various religions where I almost ignored the leadership and just focused on getting out of it what I could, from the music, or readings, or other rituals. Maybe that’s also part of American independence/individualism.

      Thank you for the opportunity to think this through a bit – I left this project feeling hopeful, despite all the many reasons for despair. I hope it might bring a spark of hope to others as well.

      Like

  4. Note: this version of “Lord of the Dance” is for theological purposes only. Copyright restrictions do not allow altered lyrics to be sung in public settings. See http://stainer.co.uk/lord-of-the-dance/.

    Like

Please familiarize yourself with our Comment Policy before posting.

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out /  Change )

Google photo

You are commenting using your Google account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

%d bloggers like this: