To Childless Cat Ladies by Janet Maika’i Rudolph

I feel you. In a patriarchy where women’s reproductive abilities determine our worth, to be childless is a curse. We can thank VP candidate JD Vance for revealing this truth in all its ugly fullness. He is a walking billboard for patriarchy. Bottom line: Patriarchy is all about women’s bodies, our reproductive abilities and men’s desire to control them. We saw this in the Dobbs decision where it was declared that women have no constitutional right to the basics of healthcare, in Texas where it’s pretty much illegal to have a poor pregnancy outcome, and in Ohio where raped children are expected to give birth to their abuser’s child. Its endless 

But it is JD who made it plainer than plain what this is all about. Besides childless cat ladies being an old trope, just think of the judgement involved. Who is JD to decide on anyone’s family constellation? Or their pets? He also made disparaging remarks about the “childless left,” who have no “physical commitment to the future of this country.” That is a statement that only a person who totally lacks empathy can make. He is making a sweeping generalization that people without children don’t care about the future. This statement is more confession than truth. He reveals that until he had children, he had no care about the future of our world. It’s beyond egocentric. If only his kids are the center of his “caring,” that shuts out most of the world’s other children.

I wonder, does he have a scale he uses to determine people’s worthiness? Where do you think childless men would land? Or childless men with cats? Never mind, they would be deemed worthy because you know, men, or at least macho men would get a pass.

I went in search of women who might not be worthy in JD’s eyes. Barbara McClintock, (Nobel Prize in Physiology or Medicine, 1983) lived to be 90 years old and she never had children. What would JD say? Rosalyn Franklin discovered the structure of DNA. No children. Malala Yousafzai (Nobel Peace Prize, 2014) doesn’t have children but then again, she is married and in her 20s so there is still some hope for her to prove that her life has value. I don’t know if any of them had/have cats.

My sweet rescue pup, Frieda

I had a dog long before I had children. Did that make me a childless dog lady? Would that be better or worse on JD’s scale? When I was growing up a carnival came to my town. I won a goldfish; the kind that comes in a plastic bag filled with water.  For a time, I was childless goldfish lady. Actually, I was a teenager at the time but of childbearing age. Perhaps I was childless goldfish teenager. In JD’s world (and in the Ohio of today) I would fit the description of lady as I would have already lost my bodily autonomy. I think I was sitting pretty low on JD’s worthiness scale.

Now, I have three kids. I also have a rescue dog, Frieda. Am I safe from patriarchy’s harsh judgement? Two of my kiddos are 30 somethings and one is a 40 something so I can’t call them children anymore. Two of them have cats. Am I an older kiddos grandcats lady? At one point,I didn’t think my kids would have kids of their own. For a while I was granchildless dog lady. Would that have cut off my value since my physical connection to the future would have been limited to one generation? Oh JD I am so confused. How can I know my worth in these scenarios?   

Lo and behold in the past 3 years I became a 5-time grandma. So now, does this give me extra patriarchal status? Do I get triple votes in his system? I’ll tell you what I want with my now elevated status. I want there to be clean water, air and earth for my grandchildren to grow up in. I want to get plastics out of our eco-system. I would like global warming to be addressed. I would like old growth forests to be left alone. But then these are things I wanted well before I had grandchildren. I want them for all the children of the world. I would like to tell JD that this is what empathy looks like. Someone I doubt that he or one of his staff will be calling me for my opinion.

Here is what JD said in 2021, “We are effectively run in this country, via the Democrats, via our corporate oligarchs, by a bunch of childless cat ladies who are miserable at their own lives and the choices that they’ve made, and so they want to make the rest of the country miserable, too.”

You know, I do remember being miserable when I was a childless goldfish teenager. But I don’t think it was because I was childless. I think it was more a commentary on the short life of goldfish, it was hard to keep them alive. I do remember this; I never wanted anyone else to be miserable just because I was. 

When FAR first started, Carol Christ laid out for us the definition and rules of patriarchy (2013). She wrote: Patriarchy is a system of male dominance, rooted in the ethos of war which legitimates violence, sanctified by religious symbols, in which men dominate women through the control of female sexuality [bolding my own], with the intent of passing property to male heirs, and in which men who are heroes of war are told to kill men, and are permitted to rape women, to seize land and treasures, to exploit resources, and to own or otherwise dominate conquered people.

This was in a 3 part series that you can read here:

And you know what’s scary? JD Vance could be Vice President. And you know what else is scary? He is already a US Senator with 4 more years in his term.

Post-note: To all cat ladies, dog ladies with or without children, I send my love and solidarity. As I’ve surveyed my friendships I find many women who are my closest friends are single and have cats. They are all amazing multi-faceted women. It wasn’t a category of “being” I had even considered before. I think it is now something to be wiped from from my consciousness as it is so singularly one dimensional to be useless.


Discover more from Feminism and Religion

Subscribe to get the latest posts sent to your email.

Unknown's avatar

Author: Janet Rudolph

Janet Maika’i Rudolph. “IT’S ALL ABOUT THE QUEST.” I have walked the spirit path for over 25 years traveling to sacred sites around the world including Israel to do an Ulpan (Hebrew language studies while working on a Kibbutz), Eleusis and Delphi in Greece, Avebury and Glastonbury in England, Brodgar in Scotland, Machu Picchu in Peru, Teotihuacan in Mexico, and Giza in Egypt. Within these travels, I have participated in numerous shamanic rites and rituals, attended a mystery school based on the ancient Greek model, and studied with shamans around the world. I am twice initiated. The first as a shaman practitioner of a pathway known as Divine Humanity. The second ordination in 2016 was as an Alaka’i (a Hawaiian spiritual guide with Aloha International). I have written four books: When Moses Was a Shaman (now available in Spanish, Cuando Moises era un shaman), When Eve Was a Goddess, (now available in Spanish, Cuando Eva era una Diosa), One Gods. and my recently released autobiography, Desperately Seeking Persephone. My publisher and I have parted ways and I have just re-released the book under my own imprint - FlowerHeartProductions.

8 thoughts on “To Childless Cat Ladies by Janet Maika’i Rudolph”

  1. Carol’s definition of patriarchy encompasses the breadth of that ugly social system affecting the entire globe. JD and people who share his ideology will certainly push us backwards. Life, under the best circumstances, is difficult enough. Let’s defeat him at the polls this November.

    Liked by 2 people

    1. Amen to that Esther. It is scary to me how prevalent patriarchal systems are in our culture. We need to find ways to change this. Will a woman president help? I think so but it is only a first step.

      Like

  2. I love this, Janet, and have so many examples from my own life I could have. For years I was childless and not by choice, and suffered a lot of social criticism for it, including from my own father who knew I couldn’t have children. Nor would adoption agencies consider me. I finally risked my life to become pregnant, and wouldn’t change a thing, but I know the pain of women who want children but are unable to have them for one reason or another, as well as the societal disdain for women who choose not to have children. Vance just perpetuates that. Oh — and by the time I had a baby, I also had a cat!

    Many more examples, but won’t go on. I just so much appreciate what you wrote.

    Liked by 1 person

    1. Beth, thank you, you articulate exactly why I think Vance’s statement has gotten so much press. Figuring out if and how to have families, determine our self-worth as women, are so individual and multi-faceted. To diminish everyone of us to a meaningless old adage reduces everyone. I am glad so many are calling him out on this.

      Like

  3. I can’t even imagine what JD would do with “childless men with cats” Thank you so much Janet for writing this. In my service to women, we use the terms “childfree” or childfull” to describe women’s choices. It really comes down to choice.

    Liked by 1 person

    1. I agree Terry, it’s what we as women (or men for that matter) choose for our lives. I tried to be funny about it but maybe I don’t have enough “funny skills” to make this theme humorous. The concept is just so dismissive!

      Like

  4. It is interesting to watch the heterosexuals battle it out over the unmarried to men, or no children raising world. Watching this from afar outside that system, I started to think about goddess culture too. As a lesbian feminist, I actually am bored to death having to listen to women talk about their men, their children, their grandchildren. I have to stop them, and start saying, “You don’t have to keep bragging and expecting me to have any interest at all in this system.”

    Every male who gets in front of a mic at conventions who is a liberal and cares about women’s liberation does it because: “I support MY wife, MY daughters, MY grandmother…” MY MY MY big male self does not care at all for absolute women’s liberation with all men getting the hell out of our way. HE only cares about “HIS” women. Now that is “liberal dude” these days. JD Vance didn’t give a damn about people until HE married a woman and SHE produced his children. JD then had his compliant wife quit her job to raise the kids, then he loved his mother in law for quitting HER job to be the grandmother to HIS kids. What a guy! HIS nightmare of a grandmother, his screwed up life…. just imagine how messed up this man really is. So that anger is ever present, and apparently OWNING a woman who “gives” HIM his children matters. Liberals or conservatives almost never say, “I want the world to be better NOW.” Without anything else in the sentence.

    I became a radical lesbian feminist truth teller because I WANTED MORE SPACE and conversational territory free of hetland. Do I need children to care about a better world? Honestly NO, I want a world where lesbian feminists rule worlds, where we own businesses and have large parts of cities for OUR territory. That’s it. If your future lesbian child benefits great. In the meantime, Pres. Obama says MY MY MY MY for “his women and girls.” And so does JD Vance.

    Like

Leave a reply to Esther Nelson Cancel reply

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.