Vatican Lays a Cunning Trap for American Nuns by Mary Johnson

At the end of this month, the Leadership Conference of Women Religious will meet to formulate a response to a Vatican trap whose cunning is best appreciated within the long tradition of religious authorities who craft impossible dilemmas for those they perceive as threats.

Two millennia ago, the chief priests sent someone to ask Jesus, “Should we pay taxes?” If Jesus said yes, he would pit himself against Jewish resistance to Roman occupation and therefore, in Jewish eyes, against God. If he said no, the Romans could execute him for sedition. Instead, Jesus famously replied, “Render to Ceaser what is Ceaser’s and to God what is God’s.”

In the fifteenth century, Joan of Arc’s ecclesiastical inquisitors asked her, “Do you know yourself to be in God’s grace?” If Joan answered yes, she would commit heresy because the Church had long taught that no one could be certain of being in God’s grace; if no, they could interpret her answer as an admission of guilt. Joan looked them in the eyes and replied, “If I am not in God’s grace, may God put me there; if I am, may God so keep me.”

Today, the Vatican tells the women of the LCWR, “Submit to our oversight and control of your every action for the next five years.” The Vatican’s official “or else” clause remains unstated but clear to all involved. “Submit to our authority, or call yourselves Catholic no longer.”

The Vatican has cited the LCWR, which represents over 80% of America’s Catholic sisters, for what they call “policies of corporate dissent” on issues including the Church’s teaching on human sexuality and women’s ordination, and for “radical feminism.” The Vatican has appointed Seattle archbishop Peter Sartain to revise LCWR’s statutes and create new LCWR programs designed to seep sisters in Catholic dogma. Sartain has veto power over speakers at LCWR assemblies and will review LCWR’s affiliations. In short, the Vatican has grounded the sisters and Sartain is the official babysitter.

Any reply the sisters choose to make will have consequences far beyond the keynote speaker at the next annual meeting.

In the fifty years following the Second Vatican Council, the American sisters represented by the LCWR have engaged in discernment and renewal, a process initiated by decree of the popes and bishops at the Council. Not without controversy from Catholics nostalgic for long habits and authoritarian discipline, LCWR Sisters have abandoned traditions that infantilized their members. They’ve educated themselves, many earning advanced degrees. Inspired by the examples of Jesus and the founders of their religious communities, they moved into ministries with people on the margins: prisoners, the homeless, women, gay and lesbian people, immigrants.

And yes, some of them have occasionally spoken to advocate for gay rights, for women’s ordination, for a healthcare plan the bishops opposed. Throughout the process, the LCWR has sought “to develop leadership, promote collaboration within church and society, and serve as a voice for systemic change.” The Vatican hasn’t been happy to see women blossom as real leaders and they especially don’t like that “systemic change” stuff.

Though today’s sisters watched two-thirds of their companions in religious life leave the convent after Vatican II — some unsettled by the changes, others impatient that change didn’t happen fast enough — the American sisters represented by the LCWR have clung to their religious vows and their life with each other in the Church. Baptized in Catholic parishes, raised in Catholic families, educated in Catholic schools, these women experienced what each of them believed to be a call from God to dedicate themselves to him in the Church. They’ve labored within the Church, often without significant financial compensation, rendering retirement difficult for many. These women have often served as missionaries and some of their companions have given their lives as martyrs. The median age of an LCWR sister today is 74.

Now the Vatican is telling these women they’re not Catholic enough.

If the LCWR submits to Sartain’s oversight, they assent to being treated as ecclesiastic children who don’t know what’s best for them; they relinquish the haven they’ve created to challenge and support each other. As Sister Jeannnine Grammick, founder of New Ways Ministry, a group that works with gay and lesbian Catholics and has been cited in the Vatican assessment, told The New Republic, “If we comply, if we submit to what is being asked by the Vatican, it would be a repudiation of all the renewal that we’ve done in religious life. I don’t believe that nuns will say we can do that.”

If they don’t submit, if the sisters disband the LCWR and regroup in a configuration beyond Church control, then the official Church will claim that they aren’t really Catholic any more. If the Vatican would declare any group of sisters to be outside the Catholic Church, then those sisters might risk losing anything their communities had accrued over the years — housing, savings, medical care.

Even more significantly for many, sisters who have never considered themselves anything but Catholic would find themselves banished.

The sisters of the LCWR face two basic choices: submission or exile.

Like Jesus, like Joan of Arc, the sisters may find a way to reframe the discussion — or they may choose not to respond at all. I’m afraid that ultimately it won’t matter. The religious authorities of their days didn’t really care how Jesus and Joan responded; in the end, they had Jesus crucified and Joan burned at the stake. In service of Vatican power and the moral authority the bishops claim is theirs alone, what harm is there in inconveniencing a few old nuns?

As the sisters gather to formulate their response, their years of prayer and discernment will serve them well. These are strong, centered women placed in an impossible position by powerful men who feel threatened. May Jesus and Joan show them the way.

© 2012 Mary Johnson, author of An Unquenchable Thirst: Following Mother Teresa in Search of Love, Service, and an Authentic Life

Mary Johnson is the author of An Unquenchable Thirst: Following Mother Teresa in Search of Love, Service, and an Authentic Life.  For twenty years, as Sister Donata, she was a Missionary of Charity, a nun in Mother Teresa’s order, until she left in 1997. A respected teacher and public speaker, she has been named a Fellow of the MacDowell Colony and is on the board of the A Room of Her Own Foundation. She lives in New Hampshire.

For more information please visit, and follow the author on Facebook and Twitter

Categories: Catholic Church, Feminism, Feminist Theology, Gender and Power, Women and Ministry, Women in the Church

Tags: , , , , , , , ,

8 replies

  1. In sisterhood with the Sisters. If they every break away or get kicked out, they might get a big flock of converts!


  2. Good for the Sisters! Their church is moving backwards and they’re going forward. I remember when Matthew Fox was silenced by the Vatican for working with a pagan woman (Starhawk). He is now an Episcopal priest, and he is still writing books. If the sisters stage a revolution and leave the church, all those patriarchs won’t have servant girls anymore. Serve ’em right! Seriously, the pope needs to learn that we’re not living in the Middle Ages anymore. The pope and his bishops need to come into the 21st century. Go–sisters!!!


  3. If the Sisters regroup in a new Catholic Religion, I’ll call myself a Catholic again! After a particular political, social and spiritual conscience for planetary and human justice developed in me, I consider that even though I was educated in catholic school and at twelve was interested in joining a convent, being Catholic under Rome is not right for me.

    So, I agree with Emily and Barbara, and believe that after the initial chaos of an external “restructuring” even while standing firm on their ethical and spiritual convictions, the Sisters are bound to reform, recreate and SAVE the message of Jesus, Mary and Joan!

    Blessed be, Sisters!

    Yours in Goddess!


  4. Wonderful, insightful and helpful article…thank you! On behalf of insecure and power-centered men everywhere, please forgive us!


  5. Seems to be a pot stirring. I’ve read about the two liberal nun associations, LCWR, and National Assembly of Women’s Religious, and one of the conservative Consortium Perfectae Caritatis (pardon if I do not spell these correctly, new to me). At first, all I could think of was St. Teresa of Avila, how she had a mission to reform the increasingly worldly nuns of her day. They locked the doors and didn’t let her in. She started the Discalced Carmelites to get things straightened out. Also, I was in a gorgeous, huge monastary in Austria, and learned that Empress Maria Theresa had brought her hoards of 200 at least there to straighten the monks out as they were drinking the peach brandy instead of selling it, eating to their stomach’s content, having a few gals or guys over for company, and not paying attention to their vows. By the time I got there, there were only 22 monks in residence! Now, I’ve found out what the real argument is…MONEY, POWER, LAND, etc. No one
    wants to just start a new order, as the land and retirement fund is owned by the Church. I know my friend who left the convent had barely any money years ago, but another one, who has a Master’s Degree and left is getting very good pay for her years of teaching. She lives in a big house, with beautiful furniture, and still does her good works. I see there are two books telling the side of each: “Double Crossed,” for your side, the secular side about American nuns by Briggs, and “Sisters in Crises,” by Ann Carey, who writes for theCatholic Press. One thing they agree on is the nuns were overworked and over stressed. I realized that as I boarded in the convent, and the noviciate were cleaning all around us, silently, obeying all the rules. If I were a nun, I would still like to have a small veil, or something to show I was giving myself to the Lord. As for abortions, I will always be against that. Plenty of folks would adopt the children if not wanted. And, as for homosexuals marrying, I say “why?”.


  6. I real rebellion of nuns in Los Angeles already occured decades ago. The Immaculate Hearts of Mary convent–they got the high school, they got the property, they kept their community together, and all over the place the lesbians in that group have served as spiritual advisors all over the city.
    Great group of women! So the potential for this group of Nuns to break free and create a massive new priesthood of women could happen. Women could leave the catholic church at any time, and create something woman powerful. It happened in the late 60s in Los Angeles, it could happen again.



  1. Abuse of Power in the Catholic Church Part II – WE are the Church! By Michele Stopera Freyhauf « Feminism and Religion

Please familiarize yourself with our Comment Policy before posting.

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

%d bloggers like this: