This was originally posted on January 5, 2105
I wish the analysis that accompanies this quote had been mine, but maybe I should be glad that it comes from an insightful young man who goes by the name liamcdg. He argues that the real beef the New York police have with Bill de Blasio is his challenge to their definition of masculinity as dominance, or shall we say white male dominance.
As noted by liamcdg, in the NYPD version of reality, parents should teach children to comply “to comply with New York City police officers even if they think it’s unjust.” In terms of competing definitions of masculinity, the NYPD version is that men in power should be respected simply in virtue of their position, even if they are acting or appearing to act unjustly. In other words we should respect the powerful because they are powerful.
To be empathetic is to be able to put yourself in another person’s place, and in its literal meaning, to feel the feelings of another. In the recent public conversations about race and the police, both Obama and de Blasio have invited white Americans to put themselves in the place of a black man stopped by the police for little or no reason and to ask themselves how they would feel in that situation.
In so doing, liamcdg asserts, Obama and de Blasio were not only trying to explain the feelings of those on the other side of the racial divide, but they were also redefining masculinity. We all know that according to traditional stereotypes, the realm of feeling is the realm of women. And of course we also know that real men don’t cry. Yet what is happening to black men is enough to make anyone who feels their feelings want to cry.
The conflicts between de Blasio and the police and between Obama and a large segment of the older white male voting public may have as much to do with the challenge to white male privilege as it has to do with any particular event or issue. White male privilege involves a complex interconnection of race and sex. It is about the power that comes or is expected to come to one simply by virtue of being born into a white male body.
In recent weeks I have been asking myself why the police are so upset. After all there is room for improvement in any profession. Over the past few years I have also struggled to understand why some people object so strongly to the idea that women have a right to control their own bodies, to choose birth control or abortion. I am coming to the conclusion that the vehemence of the protest is rooted in the perception that the patriarchal edifice is crumbling.
Forty years ago, inspired by the feminist movement, men began to speak about redefining masculinity. This was easier said than done. It is so easy to accuse men who criticize male power as domination of being “sissies,” “girls,” or “gay.” Even men who might want to discuss the subject may be afraid of being labeled.
I say the fact that the NYPD is turning its back on de Blasio is one measure of how far we have come. I suggest that the NYPD recognizes that a different definition of masculinity and male power is being born right before their eyes. And it is this that they cannot bear to see.
We have been taught that feeling and feeling the feelings of others belongs in the feminine realm. What if it doesn’t? What if in the end male power and female power are much the same? And what if they both begin with empathy?
Perhaps we really have “come a long way baby.”
According to Heide Goettner-Abendroth, whose work I am fond of discussing on FAR, matriarchal societies defined the power of males and the power of females similarly.
What if Freud got it wrong? What if males do not have to differentiate themselves from their mothers by becoming “not like” women and girls? What if masculinity and femininity are not polar opposites? What if all any of us has to do is to learn to embody the qualities of those who nurture us?
We are beginning to glimpse a different world. Any thoughts on how to bring the NYPD and other older white males into a new world along with us?
Discover more from Feminism and Religion
Subscribe to get the latest posts sent to your email.


Great repost. It’s interesting that I find myself reluctant to comment, so I will. I’ve never really understood the whole masculine/feminine thing. I know that remark will ‘shock’ people. I’ve never seen them as polar opposites. For me it’s always been the question of how can we be our best self, that is aware, able to place things in perspective, that is an active and empathic choice-maker who connects with others from the heart and in resonance with spirit. Some of these qualities are ‘labelled’ as more feminine or more masculine, but who cares? It’s about being human! I agree however, that in patriarchal societies, some qualities are rewarded and others ridiculed. I think that is more the question we should be asking ourselves – what values nurture life in a sustainable way?
LikeLike
I think women who have suffered under male abuse – sexual, emotional, psychological – out of necessity MUST separate themselves from men in order to begin to reclaim themselves. I know I did and fortunately the second wave of feminism was there to support me. I was able to come to terms with my abuse over a long period of time and this allows me to look at feminism with different eyes. For me feminism seem more like a rite of passage than a permanent identity. ..Today I identify myself with “womanist (Alice Walker) more than feminist because the former allows me to to be clear about my perspective ( I am definitely woman centered) without the baggage that feminism often brings with it. With that much said I support feminists like Carol was with all my heart and soul, and respect many others with different perspectives. Both women and men are capable of nurturing life in a compassionate sustainable way although expressions may differ…In this country I think it has become impossible to see beyond the horror of ICE for example – these monsters are men.
LikeLiked by 1 person
“What if in the end male power and female power are much the same? And what if they both begin with empathy?” WHAT A QUESTION. Empathy is the key that opens the door to relationship and all humans have that capacity. White male supremacy distorts reality because it is a patriarchal construct and patriarchy whether present in men or women is a destroyer of empathy and soul. CURRENTLY white male supremacy seems to be dominating most of the world – it’s like an infection that’s gone out of control – it twists our reality modeling to younger males that abuse of power is normalized. Worst of all it separates women from men who do have the capacity for empathy and could support one another each in his or her own way.
LikeLiked by 1 person
I just watched Societies of Peace by Heide Goettner-Abendroth. Through her work and that of a growing cohort of indigenous people who have come forth to speak about their own societies, matriarchy has been given a new and more precise definition…. yes indeed – This woman’s scholarship is so well grounded that it is capable of teaching everyone…. Oh How I wish this kind of scholarship is still confined to the shadows…
LikeLike